The heirs of Jack Kirby aren't merely trying to wrest control of such iconic superheroes as Spider-Man, Hulk and X-Men from Marvel and its new, possibly nervous owners at the Walt Disney Co.
We got our hands on two of the 45 notices of termination served under the Copyright Act last week on Marvel, Disney, Sony, Universal, Fox, Paramount and others, and the demands are potentially much broader than has been reported.
The copyright termination notices pertaining to Spider-Man and Fantastic Four are written to recapture control of most of the well-known characters in each mythology, to the extent that Kirby contributed to them.
First, some backstory: Comics fans know Kirby's work as intimately as their Spidey Underoos. Even though the Webslinger's origins are generally credited to Stan Lee and reclusive artist Steve Ditko, Kirby was key in the character's early development in Marvel¹s pages. Lee first approached Kirby, with whom he had already created Fantastic Four, X-Men and the Hulk, among others, to help flesh out the concept and initially draw the comic.
According to several accounts, Kirby, with his Captain America co-creator Joe Simon, did create a character called the Silver Spider, whose alter ego was an orphaned boy living with two elderly people, and that character was morphed into Spider-Man. Other accounts have the Silver Spider becoming the Fly for another comic company.
The characters appear in a footnote of the termination notice and probably are included as a precautionary measure to make sure Kirby's heirs don't leave anything on the table. But their inclusion raises the stakes in what is likely going to be a heated back-and-forth between Kirby attorney Marc Toberoff and the legal firepower of five studios.
Under U.S. law, creators or their heirs can in certain situations "terminate" copyright grants and recapture rights. Last year Toberoff helped the heirs of Superman co-creator Jerry Siegel successfully recapture many of the character's original copyrights from Warner Bros. and DC Comics.
If successful, the Kirby family could claim copyright ownership starting at the 56 year mark--as early as 2018 for Spider-Man and 2017 for Fantastic Four, according to the notices of termination. With copyright currently extending to a 95-year term, the family would be free to license and exploit the character for a long, long time.
Plus, with Kirby's creations including villains and key supporting characters in Marvel comics, more termination notices are expected in the coming months.
Today Marvel issued only a brief statement on the matter: "Marvel received the termination notices and is reviewing the information and has no additional comment at this time."








I would say this book so this is hands down the greatest comic book ever written.Stan Lee's best work is in Amazing Fantasy #15.The story tells the origin and the first appearance of the worlds most beloved superhero the Amazing Spider-Man.The story is wonderful and has some of the best writing and art work the world has ever seen.The tale of Peter Parker is one of the best.You won just find this book at any store remember it worth thousands.This one story has inspired movies and video games gallore!Spider-man Captred our hearts and attention while Stan Lee and Steve Ditko won our admiration and respect with this Fantastic....
Posted by: christmas shopping | December 01, 2009 at 02:42 AM
Hi Guy's,
The story is wonderful and has some of the best writing and art work the world has ever seen.The tale of Peter Parker is one of the best.You won just find this book at any store remember it worth thousands.This one story has inspired movies and video games gallore!
Posted by: 16gb micro sd card | February 16, 2010 at 08:31 PM
The tale of Peter Parker is one of the best.You won just find this book at any store remember it worth thousands.
Posted by: Aion kinah | April 01, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Where was his family 40+ years ago??? If Kirby felt slighted, HE himself could have sued. He obviously didn't. His family is trying to live off of work he contracted for. His works belong to those who paid for it. That's like a maid suing her employer for a bed she made. A cook suing to retrieve the consumed meal he made and was paid for on an agreed upon price. Too bad our court system isn't like England's...loser pays. PS...Naturalnews.com has a news story the so called media isn't covering. I am shocked that it is true
Posted by: wdmorgan | June 02, 2010 at 09:16 AM